Craig Murray - The Guardian Rejoices Inwards The Silencing Of Assange
Craig Murray
Boy, produce I loathe The Guardian. I bought that newspaper for years as well as carried it almost every bit a badge of honour, as well as possibly it was okay once, but I suspect that to about flat it was e'er leading me away from the truth to protect the establishment's interests.
When I was a teen I was buying the Daily Mirror every twenty-four hr menstruum when I found a discarded Guardian on a prepare as well as every bit it was a big, of import looking broadsheet, I assumed it was a Tory rag but when I read it I thought, wow, this is my paper, as well as from that twenty-four hr menstruum on I bought it. Anyway, years after I withal supported the Guardian past times buying the kindle version because it was cheep, but I withal wanted to contribute despite the fact I could read it for costless online. But as well as then came the large crunch, inwards the evenings I started writing on CiF arguing alongside the correct wingers because I couldn't sympathize why at that spot wasn't to a greater extent than left fly views inwards CiF; it seems the correct was especially prevalent.
George Monbiot said about of these writers were beingness paid to inundation the left fly media alongside correct fly views to larn inwards expect that its readers, as well as the nation, were mainly on the right. It was foreign how everyday the outset 20 or thus posts were from correct wingers, as well as inwards those days the outset to write inwards would remain upward front end all twenty-four hr menstruum for everyone to see. So, when I was on vacation in i lawsuit I got upward at 5am inwards the forenoon as well as these posts past times correct wingers were already there, thus they had to endure sitting at that spot waiting all nighttime to larn inwards first, although they were in all probability American thus they could produce it through the day.
So I decided to accept them on ans laid almost dismantling their arguments past times putting out existent facts, quotes, as well as links to sites as well as I idea the Guardian would endure pleased alongside me, but approximate what, the Guardian moderators started removing my posts. I felt actually guilty at outset feeling I had done something wrong. Then i twenty-four hr menstruum the Guardian had an article almost an quest about posh apartments inwards the Canary Wharf which showed the extravagant opulence of the rich which many people found distasteful as well as at that spot was lots of complaints from the public. But the the correct were at that spot over again maxim that the One Percent were the task creators as well as through trickle downward economic science nosotros all got to earn a living. So I found a weblog past times a London police officer who was an proficient on City of London offense as well as he said the Square Mile was the biggest fiscal offense centre of the world, thus I pose out quotes from his weblog as well as links but the Guardian removed them. I at nowadays knew why the left was nether represented inwards CiF, the Guardian was just removing all their posts. I never bought the Guardian over again after that.
The Guardian has today published a whole serial of assault slice articles on Julian Assange which plainly exult inwards the fact he has at nowadays been silenced past times the cutting of his communication alongside the exterior world. They besides include outright lies such every bit this i past times Dan Collyns:
In fact Julian Assange was questioned for 2 days enterprise inwards the Embassy past times Swedish procurators as well as constabulary inwards Nov 2016. The declaration he gave to them at that fourth dimension I published inwards full. Following that questioning it was champaign that at that spot was no promise of a successful prosecution, especially every bit the exclusively physical show Swedish Police had was a safe Anna Ardin claimed he had worn but which had no describe of his deoxyribonucleic acid – a physical impossibility.
Dan Collyns is a freelance based inwards Peru, but the Guardian’s editors sure know it is blatantly untrue that the investigation into Assange was dropped because he could non endure questioned. They have got knowingly published a lie. “Facts are sacred” there, apparently.
The Guardian article gives about other consummate lie, this fourth dimension inwards the Harding penned section, where it says that “sources” discover that Assange had hacked into the Embassy’s communications. That is completely untrue every bit are the “facts” given almost Julian’s human relationship alongside the Embassy staff, whom I know well. It is champaign that these “sources” are split upward from the Ecuadorean safety dossier published inwards Focus Republic of Ecuador past times the CIA. I would bet whatsoever coin that these anonymous “sources” are every bit e'er Harding’s mates inwards the U.K. safety services. That the Guardian should allow itself to endure used inwards a safety service disinformation have designed to provoke distrust betwixt Assange as well as Embassy staff, is appalling.
I had a front end row spot inwards 2010 when the Guardian all of a precipitous switched from championing Assange to attacking him, inwards a deeply unedifying row almost the rights as well as coin from a projected autobiography. But they have got sunk to a novel depression today inwards a collaboration betwixt long term MI6 mouthpiece Luke Harding as well as the CIA financed neo-con propagandists of Focus Ecuador.
The Guardian pieces are total of really startling revelations. Would y'all ever have got guessed, for example, that Julian Assange was visited past times his Wikileaks colleague Sarah Harrison, his friends Vaughn Smith and, err, me, as well as his lawyer Gareth Peirce?! This peachy scandal, Harding states inwards an assertion every bit evidence-free every bit his entire “Russia hacked the elections” book, “will involvement Mueller”. Despite the fact none of these visits was hugger-mugger as well as mine was broadcast alive to the footing past times Wikileaks on Brexit plebiscite night.
The aim of the “Guardian” slice is of course of report to assist urge Republic of Ecuador to expel Julian from the Embassy. There is no incertitude that the actions of Lenin Moreno, nether extreme draw per unit of measurement area from the USA, have got been severely disappointing, though I am to a greater extent than inclined to praise Republic of Ecuador for its courageous defiance of the US than blame it for eventually caving inwards to the vast resources the CIA is spending on undermining it. It is besides worth noting that, ship service the Francoist human rights abuses inwards Catalonia, it was Kingdom of Spain as well as the European Union joining inwards US draw per unit of measurement area which tipped the balance.
Julian’s principled refusal to abandon the Catalan cause, against at in i lawsuit Ecuadorean threats to produce exactly what they have got at nowadays done, has non received the credit it deserves.
The same Blairites who supported the latest Israeli massacre volition this forenoon endure revelling inwards the Guardian’s celebration of the silencing of a cardinal dissident voice. I have got no wishing to endeavour as well as sympathize these people.
KV - Why I Stopped Buying The Guardian
When I was a teen I was buying the Daily Mirror every twenty-four hr menstruum when I found a discarded Guardian on a prepare as well as every bit it was a big, of import looking broadsheet, I assumed it was a Tory rag but when I read it I thought, wow, this is my paper, as well as from that twenty-four hr menstruum on I bought it. Anyway, years after I withal supported the Guardian past times buying the kindle version because it was cheep, but I withal wanted to contribute despite the fact I could read it for costless online. But as well as then came the large crunch, inwards the evenings I started writing on CiF arguing alongside the correct wingers because I couldn't sympathize why at that spot wasn't to a greater extent than left fly views inwards CiF; it seems the correct was especially prevalent.
George Monbiot said about of these writers were beingness paid to inundation the left fly media alongside correct fly views to larn inwards expect that its readers, as well as the nation, were mainly on the right. It was foreign how everyday the outset 20 or thus posts were from correct wingers, as well as inwards those days the outset to write inwards would remain upward front end all twenty-four hr menstruum for everyone to see. So, when I was on vacation in i lawsuit I got upward at 5am inwards the forenoon as well as these posts past times correct wingers were already there, thus they had to endure sitting at that spot waiting all nighttime to larn inwards first, although they were in all probability American thus they could produce it through the day.
So I decided to accept them on ans laid almost dismantling their arguments past times putting out existent facts, quotes, as well as links to sites as well as I idea the Guardian would endure pleased alongside me, but approximate what, the Guardian moderators started removing my posts. I felt actually guilty at outset feeling I had done something wrong. Then i twenty-four hr menstruum the Guardian had an article almost an quest about posh apartments inwards the Canary Wharf which showed the extravagant opulence of the rich which many people found distasteful as well as at that spot was lots of complaints from the public. But the the correct were at that spot over again maxim that the One Percent were the task creators as well as through trickle downward economic science nosotros all got to earn a living. So I found a weblog past times a London police officer who was an proficient on City of London offense as well as he said the Square Mile was the biggest fiscal offense centre of the world, thus I pose out quotes from his weblog as well as links but the Guardian removed them. I at nowadays knew why the left was nether represented inwards CiF, the Guardian was just removing all their posts. I never bought the Guardian over again after that.
No comments