Weekend Edition: Firing Rosa Parks For Non Giving Upwards Her Topographic Point On The Bus
The adult woman belongings upward the so-called "Abacus sign" at the Occupy Wall Street bear witness has been identified. Her cite is Caitlin Curran together with hither (again) is the famous film of her belongings her sign.
As readers volition know I idea this sign was misleading inwards that it was inaccurate almost the nature of the Abacus transaction. Still - every bit written - together with every bit i of my readers has observed - the disputation is pure motherhood. If you lot intend it is not wrong to practice a mortgage-backed safety filled alongside loans you lot know are going to neglect thus that you lot tin john sell it to a customer who isn't aware that you lot sabotaged it past times intentionally picking the misleadingly rated loans most probable to hold upward defaulted upon together with thus allow me know. (I volition expose you lot a project inwards investment banking!)
The film has had career adverse impacts on Caitlin. She was a journalist at The Takeaway together with the film got her fired. There is currently a vogue of non-right-wing intelligence outlets to enforce a rigorous non-advocacy topographic point on their staff - together with they volition burn them for any political donation or any political involvement. Caitlin wrote almost this in Gawker.
The right-wing intelligence outlets don't enforce that - exactly await at the roster of Fox News.
This is ridiculous. The managing manager Mark Effron is enforcing a measure that is philosophically indefensible but he is besides brain-dead to run across it.
So allow me pose it only for Mark Effron's benefit. Had Rosa Parks been an employee of yours - together with had she chosen to non stand upward up on the motorbus because a white someone wanted that topographic point would you lot possess got fired her? (Rosa Park's activity was clearly political protest...)
If you lot would possess got together with thus you lot are evil together with you lot should resign for the practice goodness of society. Go on Mark - practice it now.
If you lot would non possess got fired Rosa Parks you lot are admitting that your standards are nuanced together with your activity inwards firing Caitlin is somewhat to a greater extent than sophisticated than Caitlin suggests inwards her article.
So piece it out. Spell out why Caitlin's criminal offense is a firing criminal offense together with Rosa Park's criminal offense is not?
If you lot don't possess got the intellectual nous to practice that at to the lowest degree hand Caitlin her project back.
John
As readers volition know I idea this sign was misleading inwards that it was inaccurate almost the nature of the Abacus transaction. Still - every bit written - together with every bit i of my readers has observed - the disputation is pure motherhood. If you lot intend it is not wrong to practice a mortgage-backed safety filled alongside loans you lot know are going to neglect thus that you lot tin john sell it to a customer who isn't aware that you lot sabotaged it past times intentionally picking the misleadingly rated loans most probable to hold upward defaulted upon together with thus allow me know. (I volition expose you lot a project inwards investment banking!)
The film has had career adverse impacts on Caitlin. She was a journalist at The Takeaway together with the film got her fired. There is currently a vogue of non-right-wing intelligence outlets to enforce a rigorous non-advocacy topographic point on their staff - together with they volition burn them for any political donation or any political involvement. Caitlin wrote almost this in Gawker.
The right-wing intelligence outlets don't enforce that - exactly await at the roster of Fox News.
This is ridiculous. The managing manager Mark Effron is enforcing a measure that is philosophically indefensible but he is besides brain-dead to run across it.
So allow me pose it only for Mark Effron's benefit. Had Rosa Parks been an employee of yours - together with had she chosen to non stand upward up on the motorbus because a white someone wanted that topographic point would you lot possess got fired her? (Rosa Park's activity was clearly political protest...)
If you lot would possess got together with thus you lot are evil together with you lot should resign for the practice goodness of society. Go on Mark - practice it now.
If you lot would non possess got fired Rosa Parks you lot are admitting that your standards are nuanced together with your activity inwards firing Caitlin is somewhat to a greater extent than sophisticated than Caitlin suggests inwards her article.
So piece it out. Spell out why Caitlin's criminal offense is a firing criminal offense together with Rosa Park's criminal offense is not?
If you lot don't possess got the intellectual nous to practice that at to the lowest degree hand Caitlin her project back.
John
No comments