David F. Ruccio — “They Aren’T Laws Of Nature”

Nicola Headlam is, I think, right alongside abide by to “how the rules of the economic scheme are set”:

“Somehow, someone, somewhere made these rules up. They aren’t laws of nature.” And they create upwards one's hear “who’s got what in addition to where in addition to why”.

The query is, how produce nosotros instruct economic science so that that message gets through?

What to do? Start calling BS for starters.

This is nonetheless to a greater extent than or less other illustration of economic science equally philosophy, which is rationally based, rather existence than science, which is empirically based. This is a foundational error that biases the entire structure. As presently equally ane encounters the term "natural, that's a enjoin to banking concern gibe the empirical warrant.

And, for the most part, that way pushing students through the chapters of a traditional textbook of economics, in addition to hence education them a narrow version of economics, consisting almost exclusively of neoclassical in addition to Keynesian theories, approaches, in addition to policies.

That way of education economic science has the result of naturalizing a capitalist economy. First, it reduces the universe of relevant economical idea to contemporary mainstream economics. No other economical theories, similar a shot or inward the past, require apply. (Nor, for that matter, should knowledges most the economic scheme beyond mainstream economics, from either disciplines or from exterior the academy.) Second, the methods in addition to models are taught inward a “common sense” manner. As I discussed dorsum inward May, markets stimulate got a magical, quasi-mystical condition inside mainstream economics. They are the master starting-point of neoclassical theory—presented equally existence “just there,” alongside the requisite cost in addition to quantity axes in addition to furnish in addition to need schedules, equally the rootage in addition to focus of economical analysis. As for macroeconomics, which I discussed this yesteryear April, the premise in addition to hope of both Keynesian in addition to neoclassical macroeconomics is that, alongside the appropriate institutions in addition to policies, capitalism tin endure characterized yesteryear in addition to should endure celebrated for achieving total utilisation in addition to cost stability. In both cases, at the micro in addition to macro levels, the rules governing the economic scheme are considered to endure natural laws, which are correctly captured inside the models of mainstream economics—and then, of course, meant to endure respected in addition to obeyed....

Occasional Links & Commentary
“They aren’t laws of nature”
David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame