David F. Ruccio — Mensurate For Measure*

Everyone is ameliorate off inwards absolute price (growth, trickle down) but distribution is becoming to a greater extent than asymmetrical, amongst growth income too wealth occurring largely at the superlative tier AKA "the 1%."

Marginalism too "just deserts" don't explicate it. The lawsuit is non solely asymmetrical income too wealth but besides asymmetrical ability rather than "merit."

Taking capitalism is the economical scheme that favors working capital missive of the alphabet (ownership too control) over project (workers, i.e., people) too acre (the environment), the repose of ability is skewed heavily toward ownership too control. The inquiry is why, too the answer is institutional arrangements that are non solely economical but besides social (class structure, privilege) too political (distribution of power).

This leads to many farther questions that conventional economic science avoids owing  to methodological assumptions that are normative choices. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 rethink inwards price of the large film is needed?

Occasional Links & Commentary
Measure for measure*
David F. Ruccio | Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame