Sommer Brokaw — Mattis Warns Of Futurity Aggression To Chinese Militarization

U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis warned Sabbatum at that topographic point could hold upwardly an aggressive U.S. reply to China's armed forces presence inwards the South China Sea.

Mattis warned at that topographic point could hold upwardly "much larger consequences" inwards the futurity from China's installation of weapons on disputed islands, the Wall Street Journal reported....

UPI
Mattis warns of futurity aggression to Chinese militarization

Sommer Brokaw

See also

Adam Garrie, a political author too activist, made the remarks inwards reaction to U.S. of A. President Donald Trump’s choice for the side past times side American ambassador to South Korea, Admiral Harry Harris who said on Wed that piece Democratic People's Republic of Korea continues to pose the most imminent threat to the US, China's even thence remains the biggest long-term challenge that Washington is faced with....

Garrie emphasized that the U.S. of A. “is really practiced at destroying countries that cannot defend themselves but really pitiful at destroying countries that can.” Therefore, because the U.S. of A. cannot straight assail China because of its defensive capabilities, Washington provokes Beijing roughly its periphery, he concluded....

Press TV (Iran)

US provoking China on its periphery: Analyst

Also

China has branded every bit "irresponsible" U.S. of A. comments that it is intimidating its neighbours with its armed forces deployment inwards the South China Sea.
A tiptop Chinese full general said China had the correct to deploy troops too weapons "on its ain territory"....

Gen He said Beijing's deployments were business office of a policy of "national defence", adding: "They are for the role of avoiding beingness invaded past times others....

Red lines beingness drawn.

BBC
South China Sea dispute: Beijing attacks 'irresponsible' U.S. of A. comments

See also

In reality, China’s goals are clear. Beijing seeks to confirm its sovereignty over a Sea on its maritime edge for the same purposes that inwards the 1920s, the founder of the Turkish Republic, Ataturk sought to confirm the same condition over the Turkish Straits. In 1841, the western powers effectively bullied Turkey into signing the London Straits Convention which piece confirming the Ottoman Empire’s sovereignty over the Straits, also prohibited whatsoever warships other than Ottoman ships from passing through the straits during state of war time. This had the desired effect of provoking farther hostilities betwixt the Ottoman Empire too the Russian Empire, all the piece British too French ships had opened upwardly access to all sides of the Mediterranean. 

After the First World War, the victorious western powers attempted to take Turkish sovereignty over the Turkish Straits past times making them an international zone nether no ane state’s authority. Ataturk refused too every bit a outcome the 1936 Montreux Convention allowed for all nations with ports on the Black Sea to overstep through the Turkish Straits inwards times of state of war or peace piece unusual ships would hold upwardly banned inwards state of war time. It is this convention which continues to principle the condition of the Turkish Straits to this day.

In The South China Sea, Beijing wants essentially what Turkey wanted too got inwards the historic menses of Ataturk. China has no wish to closed the South China Sea to the wider world, permit lone the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries who contender sovereignty over parts of the Sea. Instead, China seeks to usage its armed forces mightiness too traditional role every bit the major ability of the portion inwards social club to ensure that unusual provocations from powers who attain non edge the Sea are non able to effectively colonise the South China Sea every bit the western powers attempted to colonise the Turkish Straits inwards the early on 20th century.

The ascendance of U.S. of A. ships inwards the of import Strait of Malacca which links the Asia-Pacific portion to the Indian Ocean, has exclusively farther served to convince China of the importance of staking its sovereign claims to the South China Sea. Thus, the dispute has nil to attain with what the U.S. of A. deceptively calls “freedom of navigation” but has everything to attain with China making certain that inwards a fourth dimension of war, it is non a distant unusual superpower that controls crucial body of body of water routes which edge China….

The geopolitics too geostrategy of the South China Sea inwards a nutshell. Ergo, this is a cherry business for China. Is it a cherry business for the US, too? That volition create upwardly one's ask heed whether at that topographic point is war.

Eurasia Future

There is One Clear Aggressor inwards The South China Sea too It Isn’t China
Adam Garrie

See also

Are the U.S. too China “destined for war“? Harvard professor Graham Allison posed that query inwards a provocative majority published concluding summer. I’ve written previously inwards this infinite almost Allison’s thesis, but it seems newly relevant inwards calorie-free of developments over the concluding month, if non the concluding few days.

The meat of Allison’s declaration is that the modern world’s 2 most powerful nations are stumbling into a “Thucydides Trap.” That’s Allison’s shorthand for the theory of an ancient Greek full general who identified sudden, pregnant shifts inwards the relative forcefulness of major powers every bit a primary crusade (if non the primary cause) of armed forces conflict. Thucydides, considered past times many the world’s commencement truthful historian, floated the sentiment inwards his chronicle of the Peloponnesian Wars, the serial of devastating conflicts betwixt the 2 most powerful Greek metropolis states, Athens too Sparta, inwards the 5th century BCE. Thucydides posited that, whatever superficial frictions too flashpoints mightiness hold upwardly blamed for hostilities betwixt the 2 sides, the underlying crusade of state of war was the frustration of leaders inwards the ascension power, Athens, too the fearfulness the growing forcefulness inwards Athens inspired alongside leaders of the established power, Sparta.

Allison sees the same dynamic inwards conflicts betwixt a ascension England versus the Dutch Republic inwards the 17th century, a ascension FRG versus United Kingdom of Great Britain too Northern Ireland inwards the early on 20th century, too a ascension Nippon versus the U.S. inwards the 1940s. In his majority he argues that Thucydides’ theory perfectly explains the growing animosity betwixt the U.S. too China. Allison doesn’t say state of war betwixt the U.S. too China is inevitable. But he does debate that, “on the electrical flow trajectory, state of war betwixt the U.S. too China inwards decades ahead is non simply possible, but to a greater extent than probable than currently recognized.”

Allison expanded on those ideas inwards an appearance at the Asia Society hither inwards Hong Kong inwards belatedly April. He got a large express joy past times observing that, if Hollywood were to attain a “Thucydides Trap” motion-picture demo depicting the clash of the modern era’s 2 neat powers, Central Casting couldn’t accept contrived to a greater extent than perfect antagonists than Donald Trump too Xi Jinping. (Alec Baldwin, telephone yell upwardly your agent!) The business stuck with me, though, because inwards the weeks since, the 2 leaders accept seemed to hold upwardly reading almost line-for-line from the Thucydides script....

This is the main reason, alongside many others, that the Chinese leadership chose to consolidate leadership inwards Xi Jinping. The other major ground is Xi's overarching vision for the futurity of China gear upwardly forth every bit "Xin Jinping Thought" too formally institutionalized every bit guiding policy.

Fortune
Are the U.S. too China "Destined for War"?Clay Chandler