Secular Stagnation Is Non Especially New
In this article, I volition review some economical history for the US since the early on 1990s. The objective is to debate that "secular stagnation" - which is by too large viewed every bit a novel affair which has popped upwards since the fiscal crisis for some ground or some other - is actually exactly an extension of existing trends that direct maintain been inwards house for at to the lowest degree xx years. It's exactly that abnormal cyclical factors disguised underlying disappointing economical outcomes. The implications of this persuasion is truthful are mixed. It is non impossible to revert to what is viewed every bit "normal" growth during an expansion, but nosotros tin forcefulness out hold back that the economic scheme volition acquire stuck inwards the mud when recessions inevitably occur.
This article provides some background to ,my analysis of secular stagnation using concepts from Stock-Flow Consistent (SFC) modelling developed inwards "Using Stock-Flow Norms To Explain Secular Stagnation" (link to Part 1, link to Part 2). My give-and-take hither is descriptive, too I attempt out to beingness bogged downwards with theory. My viewpoint hither - that secular stagnation did non exactly all of a abrupt look afterwards 2010 - helps solidify the analysis inwards those articles, every bit it is clear that a lot of trends inwards savings flows that I illustrated therein were inwards house for some time. Very simply, I encounter much less to explicate nearly post-2010 economical functioning than those who argued that economical functioning from 1991-2007 ("The Great Moderation") was inwards some sense "optimal", too solely recent functioning is abnormal.
The explanation of why growth is instantly lower is that growth was propped upwards past times investment booms that were a mistake. Now that people direct maintain learned non to repeat those mistakes, growth rates are instantly at their truthful underlying trend. This declaration is a paraphrase of Warren Mosler's description of this period, although he also lumps inwards the Savings & Loan crisis with the listing of mistakes that boosted growth. I outset ran into this viewpoint from my outset boss when I started inwards finance inwards 1998, too thus this describe of thinking has been around for awhile. From the standpoint of Minsky's analytical framework, the electrical current environs tin forcefulness out live viewed every bit the contrary of the normal procedure of person sector entities ramping upwards leverage from expansion-to-expansion. This is the resultant of caution picked upwards inwards reply to majority default events, which is how conduct changed afterwards the 1930s.
As inwards the previous articles, I volition exactly aspect at the United States. Other developed countries had a like designing of evolution (except Japan), but exceptional factors also had an of import comport on on the economical bicycle over the past times xx years. For example, the euro expanse had a tendency of convergence too departure inwards economies. The Great Britain flirted with an telephone commutation charge per unit of measurement regime, but was violently ejected from the ERM. These exceptional factors somewhat cloud the give-and-take of the trends.
The nautical chart inwards a higher house shows nominal too existent gross domestic product growth. I direct maintain added a blood-red describe at the halt of the 1990-1 recession (at March 1991) to become far clear which fourth dimension interval I am interested in. In the before periods, existent gross domestic product growth of 5% or greater was mutual (although recessions were to a greater extent than frequent). In the post-1991 period, annual existent gross domestic product growth was by too large lower than 5%, other than the high growth spurt at the halt of the decade that I highlighted inwards a bluish box.
My declaration is that this menstruum of stronger growth was an abnormality, too was non-sustainable. The growth during the 2001-2007 expansion was weaker, but it also relied on non-sustainable trends. What nosotros are seeing inwards the post-2010 menstruum is the truthful underlying tendency for growth, instantly that the excesses of before periods direct maintain disappeared.
During the post-1991 period, inflation largely ceased to live an number inwards the US (although both inflation too deflation movement anguish with economists too marketplace commentators). The nautical chart inwards a higher house shows the annual inflation charge per unit of measurement for core consumer inflation - that is, using the inflation index excluding nutrient too liberate energy items. I direct maintain showed the core PCE deflator, rather than CPI, every bit that is the Fed's preferred mensurate of inflation. (NOTE: the PCE deflator is an index used to convert nominal Personal Consumption Expenditures from their nominal - electrical current dollar amounts - to existent (inflation adjusted quantities) inside the gross domestic product calculation.)
Since 1994, when the disinflation procedure was complete, annual gist PCE inflation has been inwards the attain 0.9% - 2.5%, which is remarkably stable when compared to its before history. The right respond for inflation-watching has been to ignore it, and assume that it volition live close 2%.
Of course, if liberate energy prices (and to a lesser extent nutrient prices) are included, at that topographic point is to a greater extent than cyclical volatility, Oil prices are laid inwards a global market, too at that topographic point is niggling that could live done nearly them with domestic policy settings inwards the United States. What the gist inflation charge per unit of measurement tells us is that the underlying tendency inwards domestic-economy linked prices direct maintain been stable.
The nautical chart inwards a higher house illustrates why the 1991-2000 expansion broke away from a sluggish underlying tendency - at that topographic point was hefty fixed investment past times the trouble concern sector that was steady for most of the latter operate of the expansion. (The initial operate of the expansion was mediocre.) The serial plotted is the amount nonresidential fixed (non-inventory) investment added to existent gross domestic product growth at whatever indicate inwards time. Earlier periods were to a greater extent than volatile too had higher peaks, but the steady nature of the contribution during the 1990s is marked.
The nautical chart inwards a higher house shows the average contribution to growth over a 4-year period. This average striking a maximum of 1.37% inwards Apr 2000, which was a post-war maximum. Although investment surges were larger during before eras, the 1990s investment blast stands out for the length of fourth dimension it was sustained.
The investment surge eventually overran the cash flow available to nonfinancial corporations, too they were forced to plough to the credit markets. Debt surged until the recession inwards 2001, at which indicate debt was oft reduced the difficult means - via default.
The explanation of why this happened was largely the applied scientific discipline boom, but at that topographic point was person sector exuberance throughout most sectors. Retail too restaurants boomed, etc. The housing marketplace recovered from the regional weakness associated with the Savings & Loan crisis. However, this exuberance turned into a bust, every bit also much capacity was added, too some companies got ahead of themselves with borrowing (or fifty-fifty committed outright accounting fraud).
Since that period, fixed nonresidential investment has been held to a to a greater extent than sedate pace. In other words, the investment blast is instantly viewed every bit a error past times CEO's who survived the shake-out,
The blast inwards housing investment was the primal driver of the in conclusion cycle, inwards the existent (nonfinancial) sector at least. As is good known, at that topographic point was a corresponding increase inwards mortgage debt that households were unable to service (chart inwards Part two of the previous articles).
The trouble concern sector was to a greater extent than cautious, exterior of structure too finance. However, residential structure is labour-intensive, too and thus that boosted the labour market.
But ane time again, this blast was unsustainable too viewed every bit a mistake.
What nosotros direct maintain seen is that trouble concern bicycle expansions over the past times xx years direct maintain been the resultant of wildly false investment booms, financed past times investors who did non empathize the existent credit risks posed past times the creditors that they were lending to. The nonfinancial sector (outside of construction) learned the difficult means to live to a greater extent than conservative during the 2001 recession. The solid sector learned its lesson during the fiscal crisis. Now that entities inwards the non-government nonfinancial sector are less willing to sacrifice their solvency inwards club to goose growth rates, nosotros are finally seeing the truthful underlying growth charge per unit of measurement of the economy. This depression growth charge per unit of measurement is what people are referring to every bit "secular stagnation". (To necktie into my previous articles, my feeling is that the wish to increase the ratio of fiscal assets-to-income is the explanation of why the underlying growth charge per unit of measurement is low, but non all would concord with that assessment.)
(c) Brian Romanchuk 2014
This article provides some background to ,my analysis of secular stagnation using concepts from Stock-Flow Consistent (SFC) modelling developed inwards "Using Stock-Flow Norms To Explain Secular Stagnation" (link to Part 1, link to Part 2). My give-and-take hither is descriptive, too I attempt out to beingness bogged downwards with theory. My viewpoint hither - that secular stagnation did non exactly all of a abrupt look afterwards 2010 - helps solidify the analysis inwards those articles, every bit it is clear that a lot of trends inwards savings flows that I illustrated therein were inwards house for some time. Very simply, I encounter much less to explicate nearly post-2010 economical functioning than those who argued that economical functioning from 1991-2007 ("The Great Moderation") was inwards some sense "optimal", too solely recent functioning is abnormal.
The explanation of why growth is instantly lower is that growth was propped upwards past times investment booms that were a mistake. Now that people direct maintain learned non to repeat those mistakes, growth rates are instantly at their truthful underlying trend. This declaration is a paraphrase of Warren Mosler's description of this period, although he also lumps inwards the Savings & Loan crisis with the listing of mistakes that boosted growth. I outset ran into this viewpoint from my outset boss when I started inwards finance inwards 1998, too thus this describe of thinking has been around for awhile. From the standpoint of Minsky's analytical framework, the electrical current environs tin forcefulness out live viewed every bit the contrary of the normal procedure of person sector entities ramping upwards leverage from expansion-to-expansion. This is the resultant of caution picked upwards inwards reply to majority default events, which is how conduct changed afterwards the 1930s.
As inwards the previous articles, I volition exactly aspect at the United States. Other developed countries had a like designing of evolution (except Japan), but exceptional factors also had an of import comport on on the economical bicycle over the past times xx years. For example, the euro expanse had a tendency of convergence too departure inwards economies. The Great Britain flirted with an telephone commutation charge per unit of measurement regime, but was violently ejected from the ERM. These exceptional factors somewhat cloud the give-and-take of the trends.
gross domestic product Growth Trends
The nautical chart inwards a higher house shows nominal too existent gross domestic product growth. I direct maintain added a blood-red describe at the halt of the 1990-1 recession (at March 1991) to become far clear which fourth dimension interval I am interested in. In the before periods, existent gross domestic product growth of 5% or greater was mutual (although recessions were to a greater extent than frequent). In the post-1991 period, annual existent gross domestic product growth was by too large lower than 5%, other than the high growth spurt at the halt of the decade that I highlighted inwards a bluish box.
My declaration is that this menstruum of stronger growth was an abnormality, too was non-sustainable. The growth during the 2001-2007 expansion was weaker, but it also relied on non-sustainable trends. What nosotros are seeing inwards the post-2010 menstruum is the truthful underlying tendency for growth, instantly that the excesses of before periods direct maintain disappeared.
Inflation - Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Non-Issue
Since 1994, when the disinflation procedure was complete, annual gist PCE inflation has been inwards the attain 0.9% - 2.5%, which is remarkably stable when compared to its before history. The right respond for inflation-watching has been to ignore it, and assume that it volition live close 2%.
Of course, if liberate energy prices (and to a lesser extent nutrient prices) are included, at that topographic point is to a greater extent than cyclical volatility, Oil prices are laid inwards a global market, too at that topographic point is niggling that could live done nearly them with domestic policy settings inwards the United States. What the gist inflation charge per unit of measurement tells us is that the underlying tendency inwards domestic-economy linked prices direct maintain been stable.
Why Growth Was Strong: 1991-2000 Expansion
The nautical chart inwards a higher house shows the average contribution to growth over a 4-year period. This average striking a maximum of 1.37% inwards Apr 2000, which was a post-war maximum. Although investment surges were larger during before eras, the 1990s investment blast stands out for the length of fourth dimension it was sustained.
The investment surge eventually overran the cash flow available to nonfinancial corporations, too they were forced to plough to the credit markets. Debt surged until the recession inwards 2001, at which indicate debt was oft reduced the difficult means - via default.
The explanation of why this happened was largely the applied scientific discipline boom, but at that topographic point was person sector exuberance throughout most sectors. Retail too restaurants boomed, etc. The housing marketplace recovered from the regional weakness associated with the Savings & Loan crisis. However, this exuberance turned into a bust, every bit also much capacity was added, too some companies got ahead of themselves with borrowing (or fifty-fifty committed outright accounting fraud).
Since that period, fixed nonresidential investment has been held to a to a greater extent than sedate pace. In other words, the investment blast is instantly viewed every bit a error past times CEO's who survived the shake-out,
Why Growth Was Good: 2001-2007
The trouble concern sector was to a greater extent than cautious, exterior of structure too finance. However, residential structure is labour-intensive, too and thus that boosted the labour market.
But ane time again, this blast was unsustainable too viewed every bit a mistake.
Concluding Remarks
What nosotros direct maintain seen is that trouble concern bicycle expansions over the past times xx years direct maintain been the resultant of wildly false investment booms, financed past times investors who did non empathize the existent credit risks posed past times the creditors that they were lending to. The nonfinancial sector (outside of construction) learned the difficult means to live to a greater extent than conservative during the 2001 recession. The solid sector learned its lesson during the fiscal crisis. Now that entities inwards the non-government nonfinancial sector are less willing to sacrifice their solvency inwards club to goose growth rates, nosotros are finally seeing the truthful underlying growth charge per unit of measurement of the economy. This depression growth charge per unit of measurement is what people are referring to every bit "secular stagnation". (To necktie into my previous articles, my feeling is that the wish to increase the ratio of fiscal assets-to-income is the explanation of why the underlying growth charge per unit of measurement is low, but non all would concord with that assessment.)
(c) Brian Romanchuk 2014
No comments