Video Of Day

Breaking News

Are The Uk Floods Cameron’S Katrina?



There are 3 reasons why the authorities should live really worried nearly the political fallout from the unprecedented degree of UK of Britain in addition to Northern Republic of Ireland flooding.

1) When they came into office, they cutting dorsum substantially on funding inundation prevention, when in that place was a clear need to growth spending. That is a elementary fact, which no amount of playing amongst averages tin avoid. The Guardian reported inwards June 2012 that “300 inundation defense forcefulness schemes across England conduct hold been left unbuilt due to authorities budget cuts.” (HT teekblog)

2) The argue why in that place was a need to growth spending on inundation prevention was climate change. This was good understood yesteryear the relevant authorities agencies in addition to departments, hence it is no surprise that the Met Office should confirm the link. Yet the authorities is vulnerable on this because hence many of its MPs are active or cupboard climate sceptics, including the government minister inwards accuse of the relevant department.

3) The government’s philosophy towards the populace sector is to curlicue dorsum or privatise. No uncertainty in that place are some areas where this makes sense, but inwards others it is undoubtedly causing distress in addition to hardship. Yet those affected typically conduct hold niggling political voice, in addition to hence are non also visible. In addition, many inwards the authorities conduct hold encouraged the thought that recipients of the welfare province are either undeserving, or victims of a dependency culture. In contrast, inundation victims are really visible, in addition to a strategy of blaming the victims volition non operate politically.

So far the government’s attempts to avoid criticism conduct hold been remarkably successful. The strategy was clear - target the surround agency. Not those working on the ground, who were apparently working their socks off, but senior administration at the agency, in addition to inwards item its chairman Chris Smith. The even out was that the way had been giving the authorities the incorrect advice.

That strategy has been remarkably successful largely because the BBC has played along precisely equally planned. At outset it appeared, equally Simon Jenkins says, to permit “the Somerset branch of the NFU to write its newscasts.” When it comes to the cuts, it is either ‘views on cast of Earth differ’ stuff, or simply non talked about. Driving abode today I listened to Radio 4’s 5pm intelligence programme which led amongst twenty minutes on the political ramifications of the floods, in addition to the government’s spending cuts were non mentioned once! However equally the pelting keeps coming in addition to the floods spread, that diversionary strategy volition lose its powerfulness equally the facts choke to a greater extent than widely known. The Financial Times reports today that “The Environment Agency has had to suffer “massive” cuts to its budget since the Cameron authorities came to powerfulness despite alert this would touching on its powerfulness to defend the ground against flooding, the agency’s chairman said on Monday.” Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 calendar month agone the Daily Telegraph reported “Officials working on inundation adventure administration volition live sacked equally Environment Agency sheds nearly xv per cent of its workforce to relieve money, potentially placing powerfulness to deal amongst floods at risk”. Cuts on this scale are hard to overstep off equally ‘efficiency savings’ when villages in addition to regions are isolated yesteryear the floods.

As Alex Andreou notes, preventing inundation harm in addition to responding to emergencies “requires a good co-ordinated, firm, top-down response, in addition to the spending of revenue enhancement revenue to alleviate misery, on the strict footing of need rather than worthiness. At the same time, every ideological fibre inwards a neoliberal's soul must rebel.” Yet, equally Rick points out, much of the danger from flooding comes from overwhelmed drains in addition to sewers, in addition to these are the responsibleness of mortal H2O companies. These monopolies conduct hold received their fair portion of criticism for non doing plenty equally they proceed to brand large profits.


Cuts inwards inundation prevention are a small-scale portion of austerity, but in that place are unopen parallels amongst the macroeconomic case. Just equally ministers powerfulness conduct hold hoped that benign atmospheric condition would non expose the folly of cutting dorsum on inundation prevention, they also hoped that the economical recovery that began inwards 2010 would continue, in addition to non live derailed yesteryear events similar the Euro crisis. In both cases they were non lucky. Just equally some inwards authorities never believed inwards all this climate alter stuff, others thought that this Keynesian thought that austerity powerfulness live a bad thought at the zippo lower natural springtime was fanciful. (Some, similar George Osborne, seem to conduct hold thought both.) When these mistakes became evident it was, amongst the floods, the Environment Agency’s fault, in addition to also the final government, piece amongst the recession it was all downwardly to those Goddamn Europeans, in addition to of course of study the final government. Yet whereas the links betwixt austerity in addition to prolonged recessions may seem mysterious to many, the links betwixt lack of inundation prevention in addition to flooding are all also obvious. And the existent danger for the authorities is that peradventure others may start out to run into these parallels.

No comments